Goethe wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Has the AFO become public? I've lost track.
[Feel free to inform me if the following was somehow against the AFO
contract at the time or not with consent. -Goethe]
From: [email protected] (Josiah Worcester)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:22:47 -0700
Subject: BUS: CFJ 1786
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In response to CFJ 1786: The AFO proclaims itself to be a public contract.
(let's see how *that* mucks up the CFJ works. :p)
It's not against the AFO contract, which allows any partner to control
the partnership itself without prior consultation. The interesting
question is whether the contract rules recognize this; I'll have to
mull it over later (after I've had a chance to decompress from work).
