On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, comex wrote: > On 12/20/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The statements I made regarding Fookiemyartug I believed (through the >> retroactivity clause) to be able to be proven true. > > Interesting; if e did, then not even an APOLOGY is appropriate.
The standard needs to be "would a reasonable player with the same information (including knowledge of motives) believe the same thing?" Otherwise, anyone can always avoid punishment by saying "I believed that [through a completely and utterly unbelievable loophole] I would be proven true." I could see this one either way... my judgements on the CFJs that made eir statements false seemed fairly straightforward, but not necessarily trivial. -Goethe
