comex wrote: >Cripes. What's the point of that other than to confuse? It makes a difference if the vote collector is not first-class. It used to be that a partnership that was not eligible to vote on a dependent action could act "with 2 support" by getting votes from only two first-class players. Now the partnership would need votes from three first-class players, the same number that were always required for a "with 2 support" when the vote collector is first-class.
-zefram