Ed Murphy wrote:
> * UNAWARE, appropriate if the defendant violated the specified
> rule via the specified action, but reasonably believed at the
> time that e was not violating a rule
I thought that when you first proposed this we agreed that the "if the
defendant violated ..." part was inappropriate. All the other not-GUILTY
verdicts are written inclusively. (Oh, except EXCUSED which got rewritten
badly.) To be consistent, the new clause should be something like
* UNAWARE, appropriate if the defendant reasonably believed that
the alleged act would not violate the specified rule
-zefram
