On Dec 14, 2007 10:51 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 5358 D1 2 Murphy 1 is 1 > AGAINST - what is an associated number?
A number associated with the player. The proposal makes perfect sense if you read it in the context of the rule it is amending. > > 5371 O1 1.7 Zefram first-class CFJs > The AFO retracts all its votes on this and votes AGAINST*4; I vote > AGAINST*1048576 > (terrible proposal) A proposal that fixes several judicial loopholes and does nothing else is terrible? -root
