On 12/14/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A proposal that fixes several judicial loopholes and does nothing else > is terrible? It purports to limit the R101 right of persons to initiate CFJs. I don't mind the rest of the fixes, if they are proposed separately.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5358-537... Nick Vanderweit
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 535... Nick Vanderweit
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals... Benjamin Schultz
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 535... Iammars
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of propo... Levi Stephen
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 535... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of propo... comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of p... Zefram
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution ... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribu... comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: dist... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: dist... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: ... Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: ... Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: ... Roger Hicks
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 535... comex