Iammars wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 12:18 AM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:08:05 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Of course, all of this could be done anyway by offering to agree
to an
> appropriately written binding agreement...
>
>
Add on the ability to wager up to the amount of marks you have plus
100 times
the amount of VCs you have, and force VC->mark conversion.
> You can change VCs into marks? I was under the impression that it was
> only a one-way transfer.
Pretty much. Converting Marks to VCs is voluntary; converting VCs
to Marks only happens when needed to cover a Mark loss.
pikhq's suggestion would effectively allow lossless VC transfers, by
way of the intended recipient wagering on a statement whose truth value
is already known, though it would only work when the intended recipient
already has at least as many VCs as the amount to be transferred.
