On Dec 6, 2007 2:15 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arguing that the AFO's VVLOP was not increased wouldn't change the > judgement of FALSE.
That's true, but it seems to be me that it's game custom to treat the reasoning behind judgments as precedent for future judgments, even though, in my opinion, a strict reading of the rules shows that only the actual judgment itself should guide future play and future judgments. If I'm completely incorrect in this assumption about game custom, forgive me and join me in chastising whomever reads the judgments in your recent CFJs and tries to appeal them on the grounds that they don't take into account the reasoning given in CFJ1813. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
