On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Ed Murphy wrote: > In CFJ 1813, Goethe argued that VVLOP is defined as a "parameter", > implicitly treated as a number, but could also be interpreted as a set > of numbers (added up whenever the value of VVLOP is queried).
Nice one, completely ignoring a precedent and calling a new case to reverse it. Even less respect than Wooble, there... at least join em in the appeal. -G.
