Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5345-5352

[comex]

On 12/5/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paragraph (e) of the proposed refactor still permits this sort of
> scam.  If something like "Formalize Judicial Findings" passes, that
> would take care of it, but for regulation to rely on it, it should be
> at power 3, not 1.7.
Not really.  This would only give judges the power to declare
something regulated, which doesn't have much effect.  On the other
hand, the version that I intended to scam enforced a judicial finding
that a regulated action (such as voting on an Agoran Decision) is
*impossible* under certain conditions.