On Nov 28, 2007 7:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 7:27 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I still don't see why you can't use a nonsensical word to describe an > > action. Just because it describes an action does not cease to make it > > nonsensical. Fookiemyartug is a nonsensical word, even though it > > describes a partnership. > > Using it to describe something ipso facto gives it meaning. > Fookiemyartug is not an English word, but it still has meaning in the > context of Agora. > > -root > Agreed, and nkep may have meaning in the context of a private contract, but my point is that it doesn't make it any less nonsensical. Your narrowing in on one minor point of the much broader definition of the word.
BobTHJ
