Roger Hicks wrote: >Beccause, nkep can be both nonsensical and an action at the same time.
I disagree. It being nonsensical excludes it having any meaning. For example, The Collaborative International Dictionary of English defines "nonsense" as, among related senses, "words, or language, which have no meaning, or which convey no intelligible ideas". You can have "nkep..." be nonsensical, so that "it is permitted to nkep..." has no determinate truth value, or you can have "nkep..." have meaning as an action. One or the other. You're trying to have it nonsensical for some purposes and meaningful for others, in the same context. That shouldn't fly. -zefram