BobTHJ wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 5:18 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
Oh, and just to note: The proof already exists. It simply requires
time for me to make it public.
I don't buy it. Provide an outline of the proof and I may change
my mind.
Here's a possibility:
The information exists within a private contract. The internal
mechanisms of that contract do not allow it to be disclosed without a
vote of the parties, and the voting period is longer than 4 days.
You've had about 10 days (since CFJ 1799 was called) to make a
decision on this. I have zero sympathy.
