On Nov 28, 2007 2:49 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm afraid I disagree. I know nothing of the kind. We don't have enough > information to determine what it means. (By the way, the "to" is not part > of the nonsense phrase, that's important in construing a possible verb). > > For example, nkep could be a contract action in a private contract, which > is permissible or not permissible by the contract (and thus answerable to > in Agoran courts).
Anything could be defined in a private contract, so by your argument, all hypothetical cases should be judged UNDETERMINED. > A compromise offer: nkep is clearly not understandable to most Agorans, > and thus the burden falls onto the users of the term to show it is > an action. If they can provide evidence in four days that nkep is an > action (e.g. a copy of a contract, with reasonably acceptable evidence > dated to before the CFJ in question), we can find otherwise, else we'll > find FALSE. We can't Order this (no Orders anymore) but we can post the > request... I can accept that. -root
