On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, comex wrote: > I think the rule makes it clear that you do not *become* an Agreement; you > are, or you are not, depending on your characteristics. Since the rule > requires that agreements specify how "any decisions that may need to be > made on the agreement's behalf will be performed", Agora has been an > Agreement ever since R2172 was adopted.
I see. Yes, reading B-nomic, it looks like they are recognizing outside agreements, and that recognition doesn't imply that a B-nomic consultation has authority over the agreement (unlike agoran agreements, which are specifically subject to our courts). I concur with you, then. -Goethe
