On Sunday 18 November 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > Ironically, the only rule that arguably causes sending a message on > behalf of Agora to be regulated in the first place is R2172. And if > we accept that sending a message on behalf of Agora is not a dependent > action, then it doesn't regulate it at all, meaning that you never > needed permission in the first place.
You could purport (I will attempt to use that word in each message I send) to send a message on behalf of Agora, but if Agora does not legally support this then it is unlikely to be recognized. [CFJ 1714 (called 3 August 2007): Whether a player of Agora can take game actions on behalf of Agora in a foreign nomic is determined solely by the rules of the foreign nomic.]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
