On Nov 18, 2007 5:56 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 18 November 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > > According to R1728, e already did: > > > > (g) If the outcome is APPROVED, then the vote collector performs > > the action upon resolving the decision. > > > > The fact that this action did not result in a physical message at the > > B Nomic public forum is immaterial. > > Since the action in this case is not an Agoran legal fiction, I interpret > that as imposing a requirement for Levi to actually perform the action > within a reasonable amount of time after the message, which he has. If he > had not, I might try to initiate a criminal case...
I find your interpretation lacking. Dependent actions have historically been a mechanism for performing actions, not a mechanism for obtaining permission, and I believe the rule still reflects that. I don't believe there is any precedent for a dependent action that is not a legal fiction. -root
