Goethe wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:The rules only ascribe importance to the actual judgement, not to the arguments presented; the CotC isn't even required to track them. So it's not as if any rule would be broken by doing that.I forgot that. How can we have a meaningful precedence/stare decisis based system without a formal record of the actual arguments?
Rule 591's last paragraph.
