On Nov 18, 2007 8:05 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hadn't thought about the bug in the win rule. (Now it's resulted in a > judgement of undecidable, but that CFJ was *previousy* appealed within the > same week, don't ask me what happens).
Judgements are appealed, not cases, and R2110 is consistent with this distinction. The new UNDECIDABLE judgement is distinct from the original one and thus has never been appealed, so I don't believe this is a problem either. -root
