On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, comex wrote: > On 11/16/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Funnily enough, I wonder if this is too broad. "hostile action" could be >> any scam. How about "hostile action by another nomic"? -Goethe > > A rule forbidding scams would be interesting.
Um, how would you write that? If a scam does something illegal, it's already covered. If a scam uses a loophole, it's perfectly legal, and therefore using the term "scam" only speaks to motives... how do we assess motives? -Goethe
