Kerim Aydin wrote:
Funnily enough, I wonder if this is too broad. "hostile action" could be
any scam. How about "hostile action by another nomic"? -Goethe
That's a good point. I made a choice to leave out the 'by another nomic' clause
as I thought it provided a loophole (e.g., our game's not a nomic it's a
collaborative rule creating web game).
It might be possible to say hostile action from an 'external force' or similar,
but that's not defined. It's also possible for another nomic to join as a
partnership, thus becoming not an external force, and circumventing this rule
(but then what is the difference between another nomic trying a scam vs a
partnership trying a scam?)
I'm not sure what the best solution to that is.
Maybe a better definition of hostile? Such as intent to render Agora unplayable?
But by then, it might be too late for the rule if that happend ;)
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
I submit the following interested proposal with AI=1:
{{{
Goethe is coauthor of this proposal.
Create a rule with the following text and Power 1:
A player MAY NOT initiate or encourage hostile action against Agora.
[[[
Borrow Goethe's proposal idea, but leaves punishment to the courts.
]]]
}}}
