On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Levi Stephen wrote: > I like this sort of idea. Might be better to leave it to the judicial system > to > decide punishment. Something as simple as: > > A player MAY NOT initiate or encourage hostile action against Agora. > > might do the trick.
I proposed an overreaction for fun. Feel free to propose a less-reactive version (same crime, punishment decided by judge rather than deregistration). > Could flooding work against Agora in its current state? It might be worth it to write a quick and dirty defensive proposal to get it distributed quickly. It's probably an overreaction but we can always vote it down. > speaking of which, who currently holds these positions (and Speaker)? The > whole > AFO winning/overturned (CFJ 1777 I think?) has confused this a bit. As Herald, figuring this out is the last thing on my list to get caught up with (been a busy real-life couple of weeks). I dunno! -Goethe
