On 11/7/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1786a > > ============================== CFJ 1786a ============================= > > Type: appeal case > > Prior question: 1786 culpability > Prior judgement: EXCUSED > Prior assignment date: 07 Nov 2007 16:20:03 GMT > > Initiator: Goethe > > ======================================================================== > > Judge: judicial panel of Murphy, > pikhq, root > > Disposition: applicable, open > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Initiated by Goethe: 07 Oct 2007 17:04:38 GMT > Panel of Murphy, pikhq, root assigned: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Appellant Goethe's Arguments: > > As defendant, I hereby initiate an appeal of the verdict of EXCUSED > given in CFJ 1786. While the judge excused me, the judge's (lack of) > arguments failed to give sufficient guidance to the Office > of Notary, so I'm in danger of repeat criminal behavior. I leave > it up to the appeals board whether to simply remand, reassign, or to > decide to make some sense of this complex case themselves (if it's > a case of conflict with R101, it may end up back in appeals anyway). > > ========================================================================
I support a judgement of REASSIGN. -root
