comex wrote: >I did not mean precedent necessarily. Having a continuous archive of the >game is its own end, is it not?
Yes, and the SD list is crap for that. You included the provision for deletion of "irrelevant" CFJs, which is at odds with the historical usage. Even without deletions, the SD contains too little information. I have a copy of everything from the CFJ database preceding my election as CotC, and (naturally) complete records of judicial activity from the time I have been CotC. I should probably package the archive up and put it on my web page alongside the mail archives and other bits. *This* is the historical record that is worth keeping. The CFJ database is also in the Internet Archive, btw. -zefram
