On Monday 22 October 2007, Zefram wrote:
> Makes a pig's ear of it.
You're right.  The terminology concerning the suspended state is somewhat 
confusing (at least to me), as I didn't realize the rule implied 
suspended-removes-existing-judgement until just now.

By the way, you could have said as much when I protoed.

> Bad style for using MMI, and a bad idea generally.  
No, I disagree.

>
> >      The CotC's Monthly Report shall include the Stare Decisis, which
> >      is a list of past CFJs.
>
> The Stare Decisis document was never really useful.
I disagree.  It serves as a good record of CFJs that is nevertheless short 
enough to post in its entirety to the list, which could be useful if, say, 
the CotC database fails someday.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to