On 8/30/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would find such a filter to be incredibly annoying.

Personally I would most prefer an overturning of CFJ 1738.  The knave
would then have to balance the explicit exemptions at the end of 2149
with the requirement to post something true in order to, say, vote.

On the other hand, a filter would suggest the natural next step of
making truthiness secret.  This could be a little more interesting,
but possibly end up just a useless pain.

Reply via email to