On 8/3/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appeal the ruling in CFJ 1714 on the grounds that the Judge
> apparently does not understand the meaning of the word "if", the
> concept of stipulating certain conditions, and perhaps formal logic in
> general. I suggest a ruling of REASSIGN.
>
> On 8/3/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Statement: A Player of Agora who is not the Ambassador CAN unilaterally
> > > take Game Actions in a foreign nomic on Agora's behalf if it
> > > is legal for Agora to take those Actions in the foreign nomic.
I think the judgement is fine. You didn't clearly state what you mean
by "legal" (legal by Agoran standards? the foreign nomic's?). Game
Actions are not defined/regulated by Agora, so IRRELEVANT might apply
instead of UNDECIDABLE, but that won't get you the kind of answer you
want.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
