On 8/3/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I appeal the ruling in CFJ 1714 on the grounds that the Judge > apparently does not understand the meaning of the word "if", the > concept of stipulating certain conditions, and perhaps formal logic in > general. I suggest a ruling of REASSIGN.
If you're trying to avoid an UNDECIDABLE judgement, then I think the condition -- that the foreign nomic permits Agora to act -- isn't specific enough. Judge Zefram is saying that it also depends on the mechanism the foreign nomic defines for Agora's actions. So I read the judgement here to be essentially "TRUE, assuming the foreign nomic allows it". -root
