comex wrote:
On Monday 23 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
Wooble wrote:
I believe my votes on these proposals were submitted within the voting
period to the proper forum and were not counted.
Correct. Those votes were as follows:
5080 5081 5082 5083 5084 5085 5086 5087
Wooble 4A F F F 4F 4A F 4F
All the proposals were still adopted.
Except 5080. Blah.
I think that neither this message nor the previous fulfilled all of the
requirements of Rule 208. This does not clearly identify the options
available (among other things), and the tally in the previous was
incorrect.
I believe that the options-available requirement is implicitly
fulfilled by clearly indicating that the decision being resolved
is whether to adopt a proposal. The tally issue is fuzzy. Various
fixes coming up...
