Ed Murphy wrote: >Change the Power of Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) to 2, This rule change standing alone has been voted down twice (while also, curiously, failing quorum both times).
> a) When a proposal's voting index is less than half its > adoption index, its proposer loses one Red VC. Interesting. > a) A player may spend one VC to increase another player's > voting limit on ordinary proposals by one. Not requiring a specific colour or any colour mixing means that this will continue to provide an unchecked positive feedback. > b) A player may spend two VCs of different colors to increase > eir own voting limit on ordinary proposals by one. > > c) A player may spend two VCs of different colors to decrease > another player's voting limit on ordinary proposals by one > (to a minimum of zero). No one ever does these, because they're less efficient than (a). How about changing (b) to require three VCs of different colours and (a) to require two VCs of different colours? That narrows the gap between (a) and (b), and puts a brake on (a). >Rule 2136/0 (Power=1) >Contests Extraneous text in the proposal. You appear not to change R2136, nor to do anything with Parties. -zefram
