On 6/3/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I honestly don't feel that quorum serves much of a purpose other than to slow the pace of the game now and then and make it difficult to pass anything during periods of low activity. What is the benefit?
It prevents scams wherein a small minority of players pass any proposal they want by conspiring to be the only ones who vote on it. I would support a compromise here. A multi-part formula with the values (e.g.) ceil(0.66 NEV) for NEV <= 6; ceil(0.5 NEV) for 6 < NEV <= 12; ceil(0.33 NEV) for NEV > 12 would be identical to the current formula in the limit but would yield more reasonable values in the low range. -root
