root wrote:
On 5/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Human Point Two judges CFJs 1682 and 1683 FALSE.
Arguments:
The first paragraph of Rule 1742 consistently uses plurals. I interpret
this as requiring such agreements to be made among a set of two or more
players.
I call for the appeal of both these judgements. By the same argument,
we could easily say any of the following:
I suppose I should have said that R1742 explicitly says "among
themselves", implying interaction between two or more players. If
these judgements are remanded, I'll likely re-judge accordingly.
