Sure, that makes sense. I forgot about that rule. I will re-propose shortly.
BobTHJ On 5/25/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If a provision were added to pardon errors that appear on the Secretary's > weekly report if they go unnoticed for a week following that report, would > that be satisfactory? At the most you would be looking at unrolling 2 weeks > of history then (one week during the report, and a second week for errors to > be noticed). If the solution is to be preventative ratification, I would prefer to use the existing mechanism rather than have it happen automatically. Otherwise I have to actually read the report on a weekly basis. :-) -root
