I suppose it wouldn't be too hard for a group of us to resurrect B Nomic. In
fact, it could be the first of may Agoran protectorates...
BobTHJ
On 5/23/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comex wrote:
>I'm a refugee from the (dead, as far as I know, which is why I joined
>Agora) B Nomic.
Ah, a pity. I was pondering joining, because Agora wasn't keeping me
occupied enough. (Agora's speeded up a tad since then.)
How did it die?
> I don't think any corporation, team, etc. ever tried to
>join, at least recently, but I could be wrong.
I wanted to have the Pineapple Partnership do that. Taking advantage
of B Nomic's explicit latitude, I planned to have it register with the
nickname "Pineapple" and its own email address, leaving the partnership
nature initially unstated.
>On Wednesday 23 May 2007 7:19 pm, Michael Slone wrote:
>> Look at rules 1-15 and 1-16. Ick ick ick.
1-16 (Transactions) is great. I don't see your objection: just three
days ago you posted a protoproposal ("Generalize Dependent Actions")
which explicitly puts all the rule changes into a single transaction.
1-16 just formalises that possibility. I really like B Nomic's formality
in defining the structure of the game.
-zefram
