Zefram wrote:
I approve the Hanging Judge judging CFJs 1666-1667 according
to the pseudo-judgement that Murphy published in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
...
On behalf of the Hanging Judge, CFJs 1666-8 are judged FALSE.
...
I pseudo-judge CFJs 1666 and 1667 false, as direct consequences of the
above interpretation.
Murphy didn't pseudo-judge CFJ 1668,
Yes, I did:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2007-May/008608.html
and I therefore didn't approve the
Hanging Judge judging it. I don't think it's been legally judged yet.
Murphy, I think your argument for 1666 and 1667 also implies the falsity
of 1668, did you intend to pseudo-judge it too?
If Murphy pseudo-judges CFJ 1668 FALSE with the same reasoning that e
gave for 1666 and 1667, then I approve the Hanging Judge judging CFJ
1668 accordingly.
