Zefram wrote: > I think it's been unhealthy in places. Short delays (such as the > Speaker's Veto in practice achieves) seem fine, but not the indefinite > delays and dropping of proposals that resulted from P-Notes and > artificially restricted distribution.
Well, during the Papyri version of this, anyone who couldn't get hold of the cash to distribute a proposal Wasn't Really Trying, especially with Disinteresting. I personally think we should be more restrictive about free proposing, people (in general) have gotten out of the habit of proto-ing. It's undesirable if the balance paralyzes the game. The question is, should this be a "basic right", or something we tweak at a lower level. I'd go for lower level. Finally, the clause "right to have it voted on" is troubling. Is it "voted on" if a veto or guillotine ends the voting period? The old general language "voted upon" caused a major scam attempt, which IMO after the fact should have succeeded: CFJ 1550. -Goethe
