Murphy wrote: > iv. Every person has the right to invoke a judgement, appeal a > judgement, appeal a sentencing or judicial order binding em, > and receive judgement in a timely fashion.
Looks good, for clarity, I'd suggest the "receive" clause right after "invoke" clause, so the phrase follows the logical progression of a CFJ. > iii. Every player has the right to submit a proposal and have it > voted on in a timely fashion. Actually, I don't think we need to fix this. In fact, I'd vote against it. There's been a healthy history of proposal-killing/delaying procedures that we should keep that this would stop (e.g. vetoes, making undistributable, distribution costs in general). We just need to make sure we have a sufficient diversity of mechanisms that takeover proposals have a chance of being outmaneuvered. If your oligarch proposal hadn't had the CFJ part, I would have voted for it! -Goethe
