On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:11 AM, Zefram wrote:
(This was in fact done back in 1994, when judicial salaries were in Points, and is why no one ever references CFJs 163 to 662.)
What were CFJs 163 - 662? Were they all frivolous?I'd better check the rules to make sure the CotC can throw out obviously frivolous CFJs... an action that would probably be subject to CFJ in its own right.
----- Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
