On 1/30/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/30/07, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On each proposal in the group of proposals from proposal 4893 to
proposal
> 4902 (excluding proposal 4896) I place a vote of FOR, unless without my
FOR
> vote any one of those proposals would not pass, in which case i place a
vote
> of PRESENCE.
>
> Also if any proposal in the group of proposals from proposal 4893 to
> proposal 4902 (excluding proposal 4896) will pass with no votes against
it,
> my previous vote upon that proposal shall be retracted and i shall
instead
> vote AGAINST that proposal.
>
> I vote AGAINST proposal 4896
>
> I place a vote of 1 yellow smartie AGAINST proposal 4903 unless such
voting
> has been deemed to be invalid, in which case i shall (for the time
being)
> abstain from placing any vote upon said proposal.
I don't see how you can possibly argue that these votes (excluding
proposal 4896) are valid.
Rule 2127/0 (Power=1)
Conditional Votes
A ballot option (vote) on an Agoran decision may be submitted
conditionally, and the truth or falsity of the condition and
thus the selected option will be determined as it exists at the
end of the voting period.
The option selected shall be considered to be clearly identified
if and only if the truth or falsity of the specified
condition(s) can be reasonably determined, without circularity
or paradox, from information published within the voting period.
I know that my FOR or PRESENCE votes will definably work as they are
conditional which R2127 clearly states is legal. I doubt, but am not
certain, that my conditional retractions will work, but on that I will have
to wait and see.
