On 1/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H. Clerk of the Courts, I hereby Call for Judgement on the statement: Rule 955 should be interpreted such a voting index of "Unanimity" cannot meet or exceed any numerical adoption index."Unanimity" is no longer defined anywhere in the Rules, so I think it no longer has any numerical properties.
It retains the properties it had when it was last defined, no? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "You can't prove anything." -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
