On 1/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to ressurect the old definition then reenact it. You can't ignore a repeal just because it's turned out to be inconvenient.
We're not ignoring it. But the problem is that the repeal didn't leave us with an alternate interpretation that makes sense. If, for example, the value was "negative one" instead of "Unanimity", I'd be all for saying that the common sense definition now applies. But it isn't. We have rules referring to numerical comparisons with Unanimity. Game custom says it's quite reasonable to reach back for the last sensible thing. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "You can't prove anything." -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
