On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 19:40 -0400, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/25/24 1:58 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> 
> > I CFJ: { Rule 1023 contains the text "Any anniversary." }
> > 
> > I CFJ: { Rule 1023 contains a list with exactly 5 list items. }
> 
> Additional facts the judge(s) may consider relevant:
> 
> As submitted [1], the proposal's indentation exactly matched the top-level 
> list in rule 1023. As distributed [2], it was indented one additional space.
> 
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg46596.html
> 
> [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13945.html

Gratuitous: According to rule 2429, this is probably irrelevant. (If it
*is* relevant – e.g. if the change in whitespace affected the logical
structure of the text – the proposal was not validly distributed,
although that might not necessarily prevent it being enacted if the
issue took too long to identify.)

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to