The race is against the clock. Every year costs $100 trillion in labor that machines could be doing instead.
Does it matter that we call it "artificial intelligence"? Does it matter that Turing defined intelligence as being indistinguishable from human, and therefore nothing can be smarter? Wouldn't we be building the same thing if we called it something else? Wouldn't we still be engineering our own extinction by building machines that give us everything we want, when all we really want is dopamine? On Mon, Feb 10, 2025, 8:55 PM Keyvan M. Sadeghi <keyvan.m.sade...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is not race to AGI. > > They're so weird it's not even a race. It's all-out war! > > Not sure what they're fighting about though, the faith was sealed when > they named the field AI in Dartmouth. Nothing stopping it. > >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T15cb7b094ac2a18c-M24cbd80920b4ef7dd578e073> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T15cb7b094ac2a18c-M83360bea646100909034ef22 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
