Algorithmic Randomness is very clear: A random string of bits cannot be represented as a program in fewer bits.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 12:19 PM Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > So if I see a string of counting numbers with a length greater than 3 or > 4, I would conclude that those numbers are not "random" based on my > experiences or samplings of strings of numbers, the psychology of > elementary number theory and my awareness from thinking about this stuff. > But that is psychology - sociology - and the familiarity of the > sociological use of mathematics. It would not be based on pure mathematical > analysis or something Platonic like that. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-M0d990966f114778e1d827144> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-M519bef5ef2e43bd695d54203 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
