->crossing the "who's getting money" table with who's actually close to AGI
could be a useful barometer for ...getting to the singularity.
Given how governments spend their money [I'm not US national but
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1341154737459064836 is a good example
of how financial stimulus generally flows] its only expected that they'd try
to get ahead of the latest trend. If we get to AGI, I suppose there will be
fundamentally qualitative differences in AI technology as a result of the new
development. So other approaches [https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10985] which
haven't been getting a lot of funding cannot be ruled out. But it won't be
surprising if its still the DeepMinds and OpenAIs of the world, there is
clearly a “compute divide” between those and the rest.
-
regards,
https://muskdeer.blogspot.com/
---- On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 05:20:28 +0530 Alan Grimes via AGI
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote ----
There is an AI.gov site out there. I skimmed much of it and the sense I
get from it is that it was templated off of an earlier document written
in 1980 about the personal computer revolution.
They're trying to get ahead of what they see as an important trend but
the bottom line is they don't get it.
Furthermore, we don't have a firm grasp on how far the design space of
AGI is from the design space of systems that are called AI or deep
learning today. So crossing the "who's getting money" table with who's
actually close to AGI could be a useful barometer for how close we are
getting to the singularity.
--
The vaccine is a LIE.
#EggCrisis
The Great Reset
Powers are not rights.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T3e69a5c2413c8560-M5e1500cbe9a7fa389e6517a2
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
