On 2020-09-22 12:45:PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
The no free lunch theorem is based on the false premise that it is possible to have a uniform probability distribution over an infinite set. The converse proves Occam's Razor.
I don't think that's right. I looked here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_free_lunch_theorem#Original_NFL_theorems It plainly says it is talking about a "finite set". -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Ta433301e9ac5fb42-M947268e0299c586fd77941ae Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
