> > Legg proved there is no such thing as a simple, universal learner. So we > can stop looking for one. >
To be clear, these algorithmic information theory results don't show there is no such thing as a simple learner that is universal in our physical universe... I'm not saying there necessarily is one, just pointing out that the math is not so practically applicable as your statement implies... ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M33ef00edadc8d2913f090b4f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
