Shout out to Stefan for being so real here
signed The realist > On 4. Aug 2019, at 23:54, Stefan Reich via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Maybe the > best interface in the early going from one "narrow AGI" to another > would be somewhere between an oversimplified English with some > structure and maybe JSON > > Yes. It's called agi.blue. Here's your JSON: > > [ > {"a":"AGI","b":"means","c":"artificial general intelligence","slice":""} > ] > > http://agi.blue/bot/centralIndexGrab?q=agi > <http://agi.blue/bot/centralIndexGrab?q=agi> > > Cheers // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwUE_XJMbok > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwUE_XJMbok> > > > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 20:38, Mike Archbold <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 8/2/19, Secretary of Trades <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 1), 2) and 5) nouns extracted for phraseology. > > > > Unidentified "F" Objects in 3), 4). > > > > > > Judgment is a highly intelligent procedure; shouldn't be the same with > > discrimination or recognition. > > Instead of 4): should be able to use the existing communication space in > > the usual manners. > > Ideally one "narrow AGI" should be able to communicate as you put it > in the "existing communication space in the usual manners." I think > Goertzel's structure calls for the use of a common cognitive > structure, ie., a common data structure in practical terms. Maybe the > best interface in the early going from one "narrow AGI" to another > would be somewhere between an oversimplified English with some > structure and maybe JSON? I don't know. It is an issue that is on my > mind, since many people are attempting their own clean slate AGI > nucleus. > > Mike A > > And most of all, AI should be active (or usable) in > > offline computing systems. > > > > > > On 01.08.2019 22:40, Mike Archbold wrote: > >> I like this editorial but I'm not sure "Narrow AGI" is the best label. > >> At the moment I don't have a better name for it though. I mean, I > >> agree in principle but it's like somebody saying "X is a liberal > >> conservative." X might really be so, but it might be that... oh hell, > >> why don't we just call it "AI"? > >> > >> Really, all technology performs some function. A function is kind of > >> intrinsically narrow. Real estate sales, radio advertising, wire > >> transfer, musical composition...In that light, all technology is > >> narrow for its function. > >> > >> The difficulty with AGI is: it doesn't understand, reason, and judge > >> as a human can, at a human level. But I think that a narrow AGI app is > >> still a narrow function! Thus narrow AGI is what is going on, a narrow > >> function because all technology is basically narrow, we need it to do > >> something specific. What narrow AI is, is really just a lot better > >> good old fashioned programs that do something better at a human level. > >> > >> My opinion is a "narrow AGI" would need: > >> > >> 1) increased common sense, the ability to form rudimentary > >> understanding, reasoning, and judgining pushing the boundary toward > >> human level > >> 2) can perform some function, some narrow function (all functions are > >> narrow it seems) very well, approaching continually human level > >> competence > >> 3) Can handle wide variations in cases (DL level fuzzy pattern > >> matching, patternism) > >> 4) USES A COMMON BASE WITH OTHER NARROW AGIs which gets more competent > >> 5) Becomes increasingly easier to specialize > >> > >> > >> Mike A > >> > >> On 8/1/19, Costi Dumitrescu <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> So Mars gets conquered by AI robots. What Tensor Flaw is so intelligent > >>> about surgery or proving math theorems? > >>> > >>> Bias? > >>> > >>> > >>> On 01.08.2019 13:16, Ben Goertzel wrote: > >>>> https://blog.singularitynet.io/from-narrow-ai-to-agi-via-narrow-agi-9618e6ccf2ce > >>>> > >>>> <https://blog.singularitynet.io/from-narrow-ai-to-agi-via-narrow-agi-9618e6ccf2ce> > >>>> > >> ------------------------------------------ > >> Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI > >> Permalink: > >> https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M3aff1fc5fb106c331c3ce13e > >> > >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M3aff1fc5fb106c331c3ce13e> > >> Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription > >> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > > ------------------------------------------ > Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI > Permalink: > https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M1c2be4146b9e4d3e5816693a > > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-M1c2be4146b9e4d3e5816693a> > Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > > > -- > Stefan Reich > BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems > Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI > / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-Mbcb0caae8534b8e87df0aca2> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T1ff21f8b11c8c9ae-Me92e7653bb5f058bcf222ecc Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
