Alaska.. Highest fuel prices..
On 3/21/25 3:30 PM, Dev wrote:
Luckily CA has managed the most expensive diesel in the country (I
think), raft loads of taxes and excruciating regulatory environment to
deal with as a carrier, so this would be most welcome if the goal is
to further reduce viability of small ISP's. They say the governor is
the best salesman of U-Hauls leaving for other states, maybe his sales
numbers dipped slightly, needs to make up for lost time.
On Mar 21, 2025, at 3:20 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/03/california-bill-would-force-isps-to-offer-100mbps-plans-for-15-a-month/
This seems crazy. Not sure how many ISP's can afford to offer 100/20
Mbps for $15/month. If California wants to subsidize the monthly
cost, then maybe this works. Say they chip in $25/month and the
customer pays $15 for a total of $40/month revenue to the ISP then
this works. But I could not remain in business if this was a
requirement in MN.
NY has something similar but they exempt ISP's under 100k customers
in the state if I remember. This would cover wisp's or small providers.
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
