Luckily CA has managed the most expensive diesel in the country (I think), raft loads of taxes and excruciating regulatory environment to deal with as a carrier, so this would be most welcome if the goal is to further reduce viability of small ISP's. They say the governor is the best salesman of U-Hauls leaving for other states, maybe his sales numbers dipped slightly, needs to make up for lost time.
> On Mar 21, 2025, at 3:20 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> wrote: > > https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/03/california-bill-would-force-isps-to-offer-100mbps-plans-for-15-a-month/ > > This seems crazy. Not sure how many ISP's can afford to offer 100/20 Mbps for > $15/month. If California wants to subsidize the monthly cost, then maybe this > works. Say they chip in $25/month and the customer pays $15 for a total of > $40/month revenue to the ISP then this works. But I could not remain in > business if this was a requirement in MN. > > NY has something similar but they exempt ISP's under 100k customers in the > state if I remember. This would cover wisp's or small providers. > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
